I found some of the information that came out of the discussion very interesting. The original post, on reflection, probably should not have been allowed to remain but was not replied to at that time (possibly for legal reasons). The posts have been locked rather than removed and that allows the posts to be read in the future. It was felt that a fair chance had been given to respond to the original post and answer any accusations made but without blaming one side or the other it was becoming a slanging match and what needed to be said had been said so little would be gained by allowing it to continue.
As was suggested, anyone wanting the complete story can apply to the court persuant to the Official Information Act and would therefore be party to the "actual truth"