Odessas and Ancistrus are all I have left in my 4ft tank of geriatric fishes. Not all are old though as both keep reproducing. I have bred them outside in a kiddie pool over summer and the results are bigger, brighter Odessas!
I don't currently have bacopa but did so, with no extra fertiliser, many years ago. I currently have Anubias nana, C affinis, Java fern, Java moss and mini sagittaria. Every now and then a tiger lotus or two appear, grow madly and overtake one end of the tank, flower, then die off again. Never add anything to my tank if I can help it.
Thanks for that boban_nz. As usual, your photos and videos are topnotch
I like zebra and leopard danios but am in agreement with fmueller in that I don't like albino and long finned varieties. Isn't it good that there is a fish for everyone?
None of those plants require fertiliser balls. In fact, I have never used added fertiliser and have to keep hauling excess plant from my tank as it all grows so well. There are some heavy feeders who do require excess fertilising but the ones you have aren't in that group.
Is she able to eat? Are her fins clamped? Make sure her water is in the best condition and give her a day or two to see if she comes right (assuming she does not appear too stressed at being upside down).
The bigger the tank the less aggression as they have space to move away.
I found dwarf gouramis did not go well with standard sized ones but others have had no problems. A lot depends on tank size, planting and the nature of the individual fishes. Blue gouramis are stroppier than the others and, if I remember correctly (it was a long time ago) the pearls caused problems too.
I would stay away from angels in a tank that small (and they will grow faster than the tetras so the neons would have a shortened life span) and stick to dwarf gouramis as a feature fish..
Check out Stella's native fish FB page. Full of fascinating information and, if you ask there, she will probably reply promptly (or tell you to do your own research )
https://www.facebook.com/nznativefish/
Got a call from EQC today. Told them about the pond leaking since the quake and they said they would send an assessor to have a look. No mention of "sorry, we don't do ponds".
AMI are handling it and they are also our insurer so if it fails from an EQC point perhaps we can get it under our own insurance policy. Fingers crossed!
A decent liner will cost between $2000 and $3000 and that doesn't include freight/delivery of the liner, which is heavy! Not something we will be able to handle ourselves as we are old and, in Grant's case, arthritic!
Ahh, hadn't seen that Ira. Thanks. We will see what happens. If they won't come to the party then we will try our insurance company instead.
Have no proof either way as whether it was caused by quake except it did not leak before the quake (apart from when it was first built and that was fixed) but has done so since.
Damn, I will have to go and buy some stilettos then
We thought the pond leak was worse but a closer look revealed a blocked bit in the filter meant the box inside the decorative housing was overflowing, hence the more dramatic water loss. Filter has been cleaned out and we reduced the water flow too.
Would still like to line the pond but unsure if EQC will pay for it as I don't think we can prove it has only been leaking since, and as a direct result of, the quake.