Jump to content

configuration of media in externals


henward

Recommended Posts

http://www.eheim.asia/prod_e_media_setup.html

here, they have course media, course foam, bio media THEN filter woold

doesnt the media get clogged up?

i have my fine wool before any bio media.

also they have that wet and dry one.

does anyone use that?

it doesnt have any mechamical filtration.

how does that work, doesnt the media get clogged quickly./

Link to comment
Share on other sites

never owned eheims before.

but the profesional series, the water frmo tank goes from top, then the impeller sucks it from the bottom tot he tank.

so in theory, the dirty water should first meet course media or foam.

anyone with eheims with feedback?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My cf1200 is setup per the instructions:

In  &  Out

 \\PumpHead//

1 ||Wool

1 ||FineFoam

2 ||CoarseFoam

2 ||Noodles

3 ||CoarseFoam

3 ||BioBalls

EmptySpace
But I feel that there is a lot of wasted space and was also wondering how others have their filters setup. I was thinking of doing something like:
In  &  Out

 \\PumpHead//

1 ||Wool

1 ||FineFoam

2 ||Noodles

2 ||Noodles

3 ||Noodles

3 ||CoarseFoam 

BioBalls (in bottom)
or
In  &  Out

 \\PumpHead//

1 ||Wool

1 ||FineFoam

2 ||Noodles

2 ||Noodles

3 ||Noodles

3 ||FineFoam

3 ||CoarseFoam 

BioBalls (in bottom)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always found that first mechanical media in order from coarse to finest followed by bio media works best. So coarse sponge, filter wool and then bio noodles/rings/balls. Just stops the bio media from getting clogged up too fast.

HTH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you guys actually looked at the link? The first product used is Eheim Mech which disburses the water. It doesn't say it but I'd assume it also houses heterotrophic bacteria which is the one that breaks solid waste down into Ammonia. In most of the filters this is then followed by mechanical sponges and then the biological media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eheim prof 2, 3 and 3e and classic.

the mech is the last one before it goes out.

i am seeing that the bio media get flow first before course and mech media.

unless im wrong with my flow. i dont reall use eheim.

im jsut curious as this is more for curiosity than actual practical use for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you guys actually looked at the link? The first product used is Eheim Mech which disburses the water. It doesn't say it but I'd assume it also houses heterotrophic bacteria which is the one that breaks solid waste down into Ammonia. In most of the filters this is then followed by mechanical sponges and then the biological media.

Heterotrophic bacteria has a bad side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eheim prof 2, 3 and 3e and classic.

the mech is the last one before it goes out.

i am seeing that the bio media get flow first before course and mech media.

unless im wrong with my flow. i dont reall use eheim.

im jsut curious as this is more for curiosity than actual practical use for me.

Eheims, flow direction is from the bottom up. If you look at the classic's in particular the input fed is on the bottom and the motor on the top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heterotrophic bacteria has a bad side

Only happen's in anaerobic conditions which is very unlikely in filter with all that oxygenated water flow. But this is the reason why filters should be cleaned when there is a power outage.

For those that are interested here is some easy to understand reading on Heterotrphic bacteria.

http://www.bioconlabs.com/autoheterobac.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep

No FX5's work from the outside to the inside. The dirty water goes round the outside of the bucket, through the foam to get to the biomedia in the middle of the bucket. This is a great system because you get a huge mechanical filter area so it need cleaning far less often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eheim has better bio effeciency, it has been proven in a lab test compared to the fx5's, what they found was that the fx5's were a little bit better at removing suspended particles from the water due to the large number of foam blocks. And depending on what your keeping in the tank I would prefer bio filtration over mechanical as most filters these day come with more than enough mechanical filtration and not enough bio filtration, I guess it all comes to down the the fish and how much waste their making.

Also the fx5 hasn't got anywhere near the flow rate that it claims to have as they test the flow of the motor by itself, not the whole system with media etc.

There was a link here somewhere where the thread was posted on monster fish keepers.com.

But in relation to the subject, did the fx5 have instructions as to how the media should be arranged inside the filter?

I've always thought its better to have the water travel throught course media 1st and then bio media through to fine spodge (I don't like using wool)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No FX5's work from the outside to the inside. The dirty water goes round the outside of the bucket, through the foam to get to the biomedia in the middle of the bucket. This is a great system because you get a huge mechanical filter area so it need cleaning far less often.

Read you manual

Quote direct from page 13 of the manual:

1. Filtration always begins with a mechanical stage of waste particle removal as water is drawn through the foam that lines the perimeter of each basket. It continues as water is pumped "down" through the "media" in the three baskets.

2. Bottom media Basket, This basket receives the purest water stream, making it the proper place for dedicated biological media.

As for Eheim having a better bio efficiency, this would depend on the media used, as the FX5 doesn't come with it's own media i would like to know what they used as a substitute. Although the filter states the pump has a flow rate of 3500l/h which is true for the pump, page 4 of the manual also states that the filters circulation is only 2,130l/h so the fact they could prove the output wrong was never that at all they simply didn't read there manual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read you manual

Quote direct from page 13 of the manual:

1. Filtration always begins with a mechanical stage of waste particle removal as water is drawn through the foam that lines the perimeter of each basket. It continues as water is pumped "down" through the "media" in the three baskets.

2. Bottom media Basket, This basket receives the purest water stream, making it the proper place for dedicated biological media.

As for Eheim having a better bio efficiency, this would depend on the media used, as the FX5 doesn't come with it's own media i would like to know what they used as a substitute. Although the filter states the pump has a flow rate of 3500l/h which is true for the pump, page 4 of the manual also states that the filters circulation is only 2,130l/h so the fact they could prove the output wrong was never that at all they simply didn't read there manual.

Why do I need to read the manual, isn't this what I said? The water starts outside the mechanical filter media, on the outside of the bucket, goes through the mechanical media to the inside (biological media) of the bucket?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...