Jump to content

livingart

Financial Members
  • Posts

    17889
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by livingart

  1. continually replying keeps this conversation off track
  2. do you have an answer for this or a way to counter it
  3. it can be hard to understand amongst the rhetoric by your calculaions in that 2 years you could have made a lot of money
  4. 1960's methinks edit: :oops: you mean the thread with the ridgetails possibly didn't look at the date, just remembered seeing a thread in the past so searched monitors on here i still have a good memory left
  5. yes there were a few mini zoos had some reptiles on display the brighton zoo in CHCH had a few from memory
  6. i'm livingart and i'm an alcoholic :oops: sorry wrong forum :oops:
  7. i was merely trying to point out how assumptions could be made from what is posted communicating through the written word can get people offside with each other when face to face they may like each other it is indeed a "shame" to have watched all these threads ruined by a few and edited posts to make them more palatable, been a bit of work and probably not worth it :roll:
  8. i would like a dollar for every time i have heard that question
  9. there is always another point of view i think i understand where repto is coming from your first post on the forum created quite a reaction and subsequent posts as well you have given no indication of your experience in the hobby so some will be guarded in how they respond to you it might even be said with the name acanthurus that it could be a sock puppet account for varanophile as in varanus acanthurus, ridge tailed monitor as in this thread
  10. i suppose one could assume they are asking a high price to ensure they go to a good home but then the ability to pay for something doesn't mean the ability to look after it is there as well
  11. not a myth when you have a fair idea of animals sold and price they were sold at easy to make an estimation
  12. at the time the only paperwork for iguanas was in containment at Napier that permit was only found by maf by accident yes the frogs were here previously, it was the origin of those particular frogs that was in question
  13. the record keeping of permits for importation of reptiles pre 1995 is basically non existent this has created the grey area thats too hard for maf to deal with so basically now it is guilty until you prove innocence or that the reptile was in private hands in nz pre 1995
  14. toppom may have some glass to repair it with
  15. it is the original subject of Whites tree frogs and the court proceedings associated with that, more importantly the judges findings, that is important to the keeping of reptiles generally and the involvement of Maf with that
  16. statements designd to get a reaction... well, i wont make them anymore. acanthurus, you can make them - i certainly wont dignify your existence and provocation with a reply into specifics another one you say you won'r make them then in the same sentence make one :roll:
  17. highlighted words that are emotive and will probably prevent
  18. sorry to say acanthurus but that is the sort of post that starts the whole ball rolling again and could be considered posting to get a reaction
×
×
  • Create New...