Jump to content

Disapointment with lfs (has now been sorted)


vwboy77

Recommended Posts

After some time i decided to upgrade my tank. So i was quite pleased when i found what i was after a rio 240 for sale on trade me at a very good price at a very well known local shop. So i placed my bid which turned ot to be the winning one. Only to recive a email a couple of hours after the auction closed informing me that they had already sold it through the shop and that they couldnt suppy me a tank. At first i was dissapointed that this had happened but what annoyed me more was they didnt even offer any alternative tank at first and when i asked they replyed saying that other people had the same tanks for sale on trade me and i should try and buy that one. So my advise if your buying off trade me from a shop make sure you ask them if they still have it in stock to avoid the same disapointment that i am haveing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

one of the TM rules says you must have the item in your possesion

Did the auction mention that they were selling elsewhere?

If they didnt, they have broken the TM rules and a complaint should be made to TM so that they keep clean in the future

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.trademe.co.nz/HELP/TOPIC.ASP ... ject_path=

They have to source you a replacement tank at the same price within a reasonable amount of time unless they had mentioned that the tank was advertised elsewhere as well. I'd also go ahead and lay a complaint with TM if the store can't address the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would also say it is "false and deceptive conduct"

You should tell them that "they have tried to sell you something that does not exist so you will be tempted to buy a more expensive product" this is a direct breach of the fair trading act and has a penalty of $60,000 for an individual & $200,000 for companies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not "false and deceptive conduct" under the FTA. Product did exist, and its intent was for sale; it just sold by another means.

Had the product been listed for after the tank was sold in store, it would be in violation of the FTA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not "false and deceptive conduct" under the FTA. Product did exist, and its intent was for sale; it just sold by another means.

Had the product been listed for after the tank was sold in store, it would be in violation of the FTA.

They would need to prove that they did have one of the tanks that was put aside for the TM auction (and not for sale in their shop). If a product it being auctioned then it is deceptive conduct to actively advertise it and sell it by another means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 item can be for sale and advertised for sale in different ways, and that is legal. It's exactly what cash converters does, as do many other stores.

They are allowed to auction the tank and have it for sale in store; that changes when the auction reaches reserve and the bid-offer contract is sealed. liability of proof then needs to show that the sale was made before the auction reached reserve.

The only thing wrong with what has happened in this case is that they did not specify that the tank was advertised for sale by other means, but being a known retail store it would be assumed that the tank was not only for online sale as it did not specify online special only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well i can say now that after a phone call this afternoon a alternative option was agreed on.Which ment paying a small amount more to cover the frieght of getting another tank from there supplier which is the current model with upgraded filter and in a different colour. Out of this whole deal I understand that mistakes can happen and they didnt remove the auction. But its what happens after and the actions you do to remady the problem that decides weather or not you return to the shop in the future to spend your money with them or chose to go somewhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to hear a resolution was found sounds like you are getting a good deal and he is keeping a customer :)

I do know of other cases where people have tried to sort these things out, but they have gone and slammed the shop on forums before giving the shop a chance. In return the shop has told them where to go as the slander of the shop without giving them a good chance to fix it was considered to be payment enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to hear a resolution was found sounds like you are getting a good deal and he is keeping a customer :)

I do know of other cases where people have tried to sort these things out, but they have gone and slammed the shop on forums before giving the shop a chance. In return the shop has told them where to go as the slander of the shop without giving them a good chance to fix it was considered to be payment enough.

Thats why i didnt put a name even though i guess most know who it was. Also its easyer to come to a resolution by making a phone call rather than email. I'm happy to say i will continue to shop there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...