those serious reptile breeders have to sell their progeny to someone and some animals end up with less serious breeders
the main thing wrong i see if the bill passes is all those worthless snakes
like when the ferret industry collapsed in this country and animals were just released to the wild
sort of defeats the purpose
only a % of the population will keep reptiles and once that % have got their reptiles market prices will drop
take redears in this country as a prime example once a good dollar to breed
blue tongues have dropped in price for young quickly because some want to get a quick buck
this years fad won't take long to drop in price
if my frog has laid on its back for 2 days with its legs in the air
has it croaked?
if i go into a french restaurant and the waiter says they have frog legs
can i ask him to hop over so i can order my meal?
some poles, chicken mesh, nylon bird netting for roof, hey presto another pen
i have kept them together before alright
don't want to put you off keeping pheasants
1.8 or higher
soft roof as pheasants go upwards when startled
i wouldn' let pheasants up till you have some numbers up
1male to 2or 3 females
personally i wouldn't house with chooks especially the heavy breeds
will basically eat same foods, mealworms and greens as well
not really pets or friendly
i have ones that have been handreared that take food out of your hand a
and others reared under bantams that are fairly tame
but pheasants are down the food chain and their best defense is flight so not quite the same as keeping chooks
best idea is next season to purchase some eggs off trade me and hatch underneath a bantam
the heavier breed can squash the chicks
wild pheasants are just that and don't take well to confinements
quieter species are golden, and amherst
some can be kept free range but some will just wander away