ok, so have any of you actually looked under your UGF's? im sure you will be surprised. anyways, my entire point of the post in the first place was to give the poster a different viewpoint. read this - i know its the article that you say "the critics say this and that, but dont believe them" but its worth while knowing other viewpoints and where others stand - otherwise what you have written "is just your opinion". The following article is a fairly neutral (ok, they dislike them but they do push points for and against) UGF:
http://www.bestfish.com/ug.html
Personally, I like them - I just like to know reasons why people dislike them. To quote one paragraph from their excerpt:
"Usually, after a few months of operation, the gravel begins to pack with so much silt and dirt that circulation stops and the bacteria suffocate. Since the filter still appears to be working, water quality deteriorates, usually unnoticed until it is too late. If the tank is medicated or overfed, an even more rapid die-off of the culture may occur. A speedy water change may avert disaster, but this is the sort of headache and frustration we are trying to spare our customers"
Again, it's JUST ANOTHER VIEW POINT. They are not necessarily right or wrong!