but it has been ID'd as rio_ucyali many times from multiple batches.
if everything was ancistrus sp. then the babies that result from them and the normal bn's would also be ancistrus sp.
then we get a whole bunch of real hybrids that are all called ancistrus spp. then we really don't know what we have.
so while I understand what you mean, because i know the we are technically supposed to ID them based on knowledge based on where they are caught, how is that possible in this case?
The importer ID's them at the point of sale, using a fish atlas or something like that. They were named an. dolichopterus which there is no doubt that these are not.
When I posted on PC, I had no idea what they were, but I knew for fact that they were not an. dolichopterus.
Then I got multiple people steering me towards the Rio_Ucayali route.
but.. phenotypically speaking, these do look exactly like the Rio_Ucayali right?
the juvis look the same, as do the sub adults. I have to wait for the adult phase to make a comparison there.
what to do?