KrazyGeoff Posted July 1, 2012 Report Share Posted July 1, 2012 Are you keeping up on thr meds Nav? I thought it was his ability to have a single focus, and stick to it, no matter what, that made Nav so successful :rotf: :rotf: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos & Siran Posted July 1, 2012 Author Report Share Posted July 1, 2012 that and his good taste in women Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrazyGeoff Posted July 1, 2012 Report Share Posted July 1, 2012 that and his good taste in women He seems guilty to me....... And almost back on topic, phew. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Navarre Posted July 1, 2012 Report Share Posted July 1, 2012 Well it makes the coverage of the news more interesting Its like asking... say you know the day Princess Di died...without google.... tell me who else died that day Why you are right only Mother Teresa.....must have been a slow news day THAT day Huh 58 min Di 2 min the next Saint...including adds...go figure but Ewans wife is ....HOT...isnt she? Nav Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrazyGeoff Posted July 1, 2012 Report Share Posted July 1, 2012 Well it makes the coverage of the news more interesting Its like asking... say you know the day Princess Di died...without google.... tell me who else died that day The music died that day Nav :nilly: but Ewans wife is ....HOT...isnt she? Nav like the sun Nav, like the sun :spop: :spop: :bounce: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oO SKIPPY Oo Posted July 1, 2012 Report Share Posted July 1, 2012 getting back on topic - i think there is a lot of evidence that we haven't seen and heard from the media - I went and watched about an hour of the case while a colleague was on the stand giving his evidence..... unfortunately the media pick and choose what they are going to share with us. the police must have had enough evidence to charge him with the murder or else why bother ?? the whole 3 shots thing is a bit of a moot point as anyone who has enough experience can reload a single or double barrel shotgun in rapid succession (we had a multi gun shoot up at our gun range and the guy with the single barrel shotgun won out over guys with 8 shot semi autos) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted July 2, 2012 Report Share Posted July 2, 2012 I've only paid superficial attention to this .. hard to avoid. But if the graffiti were directed at the wife ( the one who is always in tears ), why wasn't she the one who was shot? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueether Posted July 2, 2012 Report Share Posted July 2, 2012 I've only paid superficial attention to this .. hard to avoid. But if the graffiti were directed at the wife ( the one who is always in tears ), why wasn't she the one who was shot? Break the wife, break the man? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted July 2, 2012 Report Share Posted July 2, 2012 What does one get these days for premeditated murder? 5 years? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oO SKIPPY Oo Posted July 2, 2012 Report Share Posted July 2, 2012 Not long enough ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godly3vil Posted July 2, 2012 Report Share Posted July 2, 2012 Bring back capital punishment I say! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Are they at least going to charge him with arson? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jackp Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Yeah, he's being charged with arson, vandalism and killing the neighbours deer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godly3vil Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 To me this just proves the NZ justice system is useless. Who else could it have been? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Could always blame Arthur Allan Thomas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanmin4304 Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 The jury have heard a lot more evidence than we have. I think it is dangerous to assume that someone is guilty because the police went to all the trouble of charging them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueether Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 To me this just proves the NZ justice system is useless. Who else could it have been?One of the wifes in some weird Manawatu love tryst? The jury have heard a lot more evidence than we have. I think it is dangerous to assume that someone is guilty because the police went to all the trouble of charging them. Why else would the police charge them if they didn't do it :digH: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dachende Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 I think the police should have held out until they had more evidence - Charge him with the other crimes he admitted to, but hold off the murder charge until he had some time to sweat in prison for the other convictions. They may have had more information come through, or he may have cracked under the stress. Without a lawyer to guide his every move , I get the impression this is one guy that would have broken eventually. I think he did it, but on the evidence provided the case was never going to get a guilty verdict. No concrete evidence, no proven murder weapon, no witnesses. The perfect crime perhaps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Cases like this make one wonder whether NZ should keep their double jeopardy laws which were abolished in the UK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David R Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 Who else could it have been? The disgruntaled farm hand? Some guy he paid to do it? Some other person Guy had dodgy dealings with? A local p-head botching a robbery? IMO its better a guilty man goes free than an innocent man goes to jail... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godly3vil Posted July 3, 2012 Report Share Posted July 3, 2012 I think the police should have held out until they had more evidence - Charge him with the other crimes he admitted to, but hold off the murder charge until he had some time to sweat in prison for the other convictions. They may have had more information come through, or he may have cracked under the stress. Without a lawyer to guide his every move , I get the impression this is one guy that would have broken eventually. I think he did it, but on the evidence provided the case was never going to get a guilty verdict. No concrete evidence, no proven murder weapon, no witnesses. The perfect crime perhaps. That would have been the smart thing to do, I think they were under pressure to try to get a conviction for this case and cut too many corners, a story told far too many times in NZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.