Jump to content

uv zapper or not????


stompa

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would say absolutely worth investing in... But not at the expense of other equipment.

But not specifically for parasite control. They make a significant difference in nutrient export. They can make a significant difference to the output of a skimmer.

Layton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But not at the expense of other equipment

i relise that.... ive spent the last 6 months reading and more reading and buying equipment for my setup as i didnt want to rush in and stuff it up by not having everything before i started and one of the last things ive been thinking about is a uv zapper .... and if they do a job then its worth investing in...... so everyones opinions would be good so i can decide if i want to invest in one or not........ who has one on there marine tank???? do you find its worth having or not????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i relise that.... who has one on there marine tank???? do you find its worth having or not????

I run a 40Watt HO, and I wouldn't be without one. Absolutely worth having.

No need to run carbon (which eliminates another source of phosphate).

Increases bacterial activity (specifically denitrifying bacteria), by splitting large organic molecules into smaller ones which bacteria can process more easily --> Increased skimmer output and lower nutrients.

Plus the side effects of parasite control.

Just get a high quality, high output one. I would recommend the Deltec one, it's competitively priced, but are much higher quality than the cheap asian imports.

Emporer and Aqua UV are also good brands to look for.

Layton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just get a high quality, high output one. I would recommend the Deltec one, it's competitively priced, but are much higher quality than the cheap asian imports.

I don't think the Asian ones are that bad. You can pickup a new 36w for as little as $240.00. They run Philips bulbs. The only major difference you might get is the water contact time with the UV. That can easily be varied by pumping a lower volume of water through the unit. THe 36w can take 24000 litres an hour and I can't see anyone putting that volume threw one into their tank.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't use one, didn't know about the increase of skimmer out put though.

Layton, do you have a link to a article on the increased export created by using UV? do you think it will help in getting my nitrates down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THe 36w can take 24000 litres an hour and

No doubt they can, however might as well not use one if you can get so much water thru it, even at 3000L it would not be a very good unit.

Quality units are not cheap as they are made correctly so that they work to kill parasites.

Pump so much water thru it will means that the uv won’t kill anything.

Here is some info

http://www.tmc-ltd.co.uk/commercial/uv-filtration.asp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 use them & 2 dont..... i thought there was more than 4 people on this site with marine tanks

i dont. but dont know enough about them to make an informed decision whether they're worth while or not. just because a greater percentage dont, doesnt mean they're not worth using!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't use one, didn't know about the increase of skimmer out put though.

Layton, do you have a link to a article on the increased export created by using UV? do you think it will help in getting my nitrates down?

If you look hard enough on the internet, there is an interesting study in the Baltic where the found that while UV reduced water bourne bacterial counts. The total population of bacteria in a system was increased, when using UV. The also specifically mentioned an increase in denitrifying Pseudomonas species bacteria.

Before I had UV, my nitrates had been hovering around 5 for a year or so.

A little over a week or running the UV, the skimmer output increased dramatically, the rock started "bubbling", more detritus was produced, and nitrate was undetectable.

I assume this was from boosting the bacterial activity within the rock -> more detritus -> higher skimmer output.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a vectron 25w that i am about to put on, will let you no how it goes.

The main difference i have found witht the good onves vrs the bad is the distance between the uv bulb and the quatz sleve. The pond ones are designed to just reduce algae in ponds, where the good ones kill bacteria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what are the bulb replacement costs on those ones petplanet

About $110. The bulb needs replacing about every 6-7000 hours so if it is running 24/7 that would be around every nine months.

No doubt they can, however might as well not use one if you can get so much water thru it, even at 3000L it would not be a very good unit.

Quality units are not cheap as they are made correctly so that they work to kill parasites.

Pump so much water thru it will means that the uv won’t kill anything.

I had a look at the Deltec site and the design looks the same to me. Water goes in, passes a UVC bulb in a quartz sleeve and exits the unit. The Pondmaster flow rate is for pond use were algae control is the goal. Reduce the flow and you would have the same effect.

http://www.deltecaquariumsolutions.com/UvInstructions.php

What brand of bulb does Deltec use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

had a look at the Deltec site and the design looks the same to me.

All uv units look the same. the deltec does not take 24000L like the cheap asian unit, it only takes 2000L as that would actually will kill paristes and some bacteria.

deltec uses 30w t5 tube. same as life guard units. also the unit runs on a electronic ballast.

if you are going to a use a uv it is better to have it going on the main pump so you pass all the water thru it and get maxium kill rate.

so most small uvs will be no good as they can handle high flow rates.

The main difference i have found witht the good onves vrs the bad is the distance between the uv bulb and the quatz sleve. The pond ones are designed to just reduce algae in ponds, where the good ones kill bacteria.

pretty much.

The TMC commercial units are real good quality and use nice high wattage bulbs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...