Stella Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 If anyone if feeling super-geeky, I ran into this paper which looks relevant and interesting: Identification of non-indigenous marine macroalgae from New Zealand aquaria outlets Abstract Most vector management and research on marine bioinvasions has focused on shipping-related pathways. More recently, less obvious mechanisms, such as the aquarium trade, have been recognised as important mechanisms for marine invasions, such as for the alga Caulerpa taxifolia. In this study, macroalgal specimens were collected from aquarium shops in Auckland and Nelson. Specimens were initially identified morphologically as C. taxifolia, C. racemoasa, Coelarthrum sp. and Cryptonemia sp. DNA sequencing corroborated the identification of the Caulerpa specimens. DNA sequencing also revealed that a specimen identified as Coelarthrum sp. by morphological features was in fact most probably Chamaebotrys sp. Because of the small number of Cryptonemia sequences in GenBank for comparison, only a tentative identification for this red alga could be made. Our findings of non-native macroalgae, including C. taxifolia, in aquarium shops in New Zealand show that even strict quarantine procedures cannot completely prevent the importation of non-indigenous species. Therefore, early detection, which begins with species identification, is essential to design effective control and eradication programmes. .PDF avaliable free through the Royal Society for this month or so: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/conten ... =titlelink Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reef Posted October 26, 2010 Report Share Posted October 26, 2010 thanks. I wonder how they can claim it was imported recently. Might have come in many years ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.