Could you please stop quoting me completely out of context.
I'm not looking for proof (I didn't even mention the word), just information. Nor do I "expect" you to provide it.
As far as observations from people using K balance, the first point is that because KZ don't provide information on what is in there products, it's difficult to say whether the results people see with K balance is actually due to potassium. For example, you'll also note that sulfur is another element which is found to be lower than NSW levels in many salts. So say that KZ use a potassium sulfate salt in their mix, how do you know that it's the potassium, and not the sulfate which is causing any effect?
The second thing i guess is what prompted the development of the product? Was there any research behind it? If so, what was it?
Was it a case of this paper suggests that potassium is important in this process in corals, and that lower than NSW levels of potassium can effect this process? Maybe we should test for potassium? What happens if we add potassium?
Or was it a case of if we add this stuff to the tank then there is an effect on the corals, and because this stuff happens to have potassium in it, it must be the potassium which causes the changes?
I have no opinion one way or the other at the moment on the usefulness of dosing potassium. But it would be useful to know what potassium is used for, and how it relates to better growth and colour.
One thing that i think is important if you are going to dose it, is to be able to test for it.
Layton