Jump to content

Refugiums


Smallreefer

Recommended Posts

Hi all, just wanting to know how many people use a refugium and if so do you beleive that they make a big differnce to your water quility also if not could you please say why not. And if you do use one wat sort of macro algea do you use, is there just caulerpa avaliable in nz? Do you use a DSB?

Cheers

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 301
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i agree. macro algae is a PITA IMO. i have the kind that sticks to LR and you can never get rid of it. the spores just keep growing. dont ever let this stuff get in your display tank. im slowly trying to remove as much macro algae as possible. if you do proceed with it, ensure you use carbon to cleanse the water. macro algae can tinge it yellow from what i've noticed.

get a bigger skimmer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for the reply, will have a look at thoose other methods you listed. But i dont know why but i really want a fuge lol. wanting to do something like this dono if i will but i might.

http://reefcentral.com/forums/showthrea ... +to+DIY+an

Cheers

Dan

looks like a cool project.

Would be a bit concerned how efficent this would be at reducing nitrates.

if you were wanting it for pods etc, then i see no problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

refugiums are great for growing critters, running a sand bed if you don't want one in your main tank, help stabilise pH if you run reverse lighting, (a place to keep naughty crabs you dont want to kill) but I agree with the others, don't bother trying to use for nutrient control with macro algae, there are much better ways.

I love my one, would be without it, but for the life it contains, not for water quality. It will not worsen your water quality either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well detritus and critters go hand in hand. If you've got a lot of critters, you've got a lot of detritus, which is not good for water quality.

If you don't run macro algae then you don't have the problems associated with it. But the conventional idea of refugiums is that you have algae in them.

Whichever way you look at it, I don't think macro algae is a good mechanism for achieving good water quality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

your need to weigh the benefits of the increased life against those points Layton, similar to the sand bed vs bb argument. I don't think there is a easy answer, with merits on both sides.

I've seen some stunning RC TOTM with refugiums, so there has to be good reasons to run them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

your need to weigh the benefits of the increased life against those points Layton

Increase life? It's just more bioload the tank has to handle.

I've seen some stunning RC TOTM with refugiums, so there has to be good reasons to run them.

Sure, but nutrient removal isn't one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Layton, re read my post at the top of the page.

but I agree with the others, don't bother trying to use for nutrient control with macro algae, there are much better ways.

I love my one, would be without it, but for the life it contains, not for water quality.

and how much more bioload do copepods, mysid shrimp and the like add, let be honest here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...