Jump to content

mr pleco

Members
  • Posts

    415
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mr pleco

  1. We seem to live in the generation of "it's some one else's responsibility". It's going in your tank, it's going to be your problem if you buy the wrong fish, why shouldn't it be your responsibility to have reasonable idea what your buying? Sure if the LFS deliberately misleads you "no that Oscar will be fine in that 20l tank with some goldfish" then thats one thing, but using an less common name, come on.

    Take a step back and look at the whole pet shop, what you are saying is that either the LFS should only let you buy fish from the one person they have working there that knows everything there is to know about every type of fish and can 100% positively identify and sex every one, ditto the cats section, dog, bird, and small animal.

    Or that every staff member in the shop should know everything about every single animal and product thats in there? A big ask when the average retail wage is properly $15 an hour.

    Or maybe they should have a big disclaimer up on the door stating they can't confirm the type, breed, sex, or age, of any live stock in store and that staff have been instructed to not risk misleading customers by identifying any animal of any type. :nilly:

    +1 suphew couldnt have summed it up better myself i applaude you

    i wish some ppl spent as much time changing water and caring for their fish as they spend on here finding faults with everybody else way of doing things and that they know best

    i am not trying to point the finger but i would love to see some of these ppl that post these comments actually have the balls to run a petshop deal with all these issues raised and correct them and then tell me it aint that big a problem or it dosent incur any cost or time they would probably have perfectly named dead fish because they spent so much time identifying them they didnt have enough time to actually feed them or look after them '

  2. I feel that it is ultimately the retailers responsibly and if there is any doubt over an ID that could mislead or deceive the customer then the customer should be made aware, just like when suspected Rio Ucayali could not be 100% identified and they were sold as "spotted bristlenose" instead.

    well thats a lovely thought kiwi only problem is if you bred them and wanted to sell them to a shop as a shop owner i wouldnt buy any as i could not gaurantee what their correct name was so you would miss out as would many other potential customers as if the responsibility fell on the shops they simply wouldnt stock any if there were doubts of its origin or proper name the hobby would lose out in the end because shops would put the omnus back on importers and importers would stop buying fish aswell you cant exactly fly to asia or germany every week to eyeball yr stock before you buy and trying to return them is near impossible

    question how do you think a retailer would go selling a plec thats "a possible Rio Ucayali , but could be a spotted bristlenose but helll really we dont know what it is on the label " cost is somewhere between 19.95 and 49.95 depending on what you think ?>

    really ???

  3. OK,,,,, The level of aggression will have been minimal in such adolescent fish unless under fed which clearly is not the case. I doubt oxygen depletion unless the outlets to the canisters where quite low or ammonia or nitrite where present, even then this should have been noticed in the plec's if not all of your fish. I feed prawn on a regular basis to my herbivorous plec's never have i a had a problem and never have i heard of such an easily digested protein being an issue. Seems weird even though i do feel this is either water quality or a dietary issue that the l260 being heavily carnivorous is effected l200 omnivorous easily handling this type of protein, and l177 that i personally feed quite alot of protein too in the form of both prawn and sinking carnivore.

    Temperature will be fine between 26-32 so i don't understand the accusation of this being high in regard to these plec's. I would like to know the water parameters before passing any judgment. Are there any other fish in the tank?.

    Sorry: Missed the update

    :facepalm:

  4. +1

    I realise that was a post filled with assumptions. In short I think death due to lack of oxygen influenced by ammonia levels is a viable assumption. A blow that could of been softened with increased water changes and higher oxygen levels. When running a heavily stocked tank (If you are) water changes are VERY important. As for the L260, it could easily be an infection of some sort. How long had your filters been running for?

    Honestly, It may be a number of factors that have there fingers in the pie (Overstocking, etc etc.). I'm only making assumptions according to the outcome, not the water conditions. For far more accurate and informed assumptions to be made, there needs to be a bit more information provided. You described the death of the L177 and L200 in the same way that you described your L270. So i'm not too sure. Either way, there is information missing and untill we figure out what's going wrong I can only speculate. Just to clarify, is the tank at your house, or elsewhere?

    Sorry to hear about the deaths again, It's not easy losing fish. :(

    Please keep us updated with the L260. Thanks

  5. Keep in mind, Animates is a pet shop, not a veterinary hospital. You wouldn't expect Animates to give advice about your dog with a tumour, would you? The other thing is that fish are notoriously difficult, if not impossible to properly diagnose. I would guess that upwards of 99% of all fish in this country are just treated based on subjective findings rather than any diagnostic tests that can confirm what disease they have. Yes, it is great that some people have lots of experience and can use anecdotal evidence to support reasonable treatment regimes, but give those poor pet shops a break. All they have in shop are a collection of odd chemicals and potions that are sold as miracle cures and there is no guarantee they will even come close to addressing the real problem.

    wow its no wonder i hardly post anymore

    sorry jennifer but can you pls clarify because if i "owned a dog " i would take it to a place like animates for advise and if it had a tumour i "would expect"them to tell me to go to the nearest veterinary hospital see i wouldnt know it had a tumour because im NOT a veterinarian

    And fish are notoriously difficult if not impossible to properly diagnose you say yet there are hundreds of books and even threads on here of diseases and what to look for and how to treat / there are hundreds of success stories of treated fish and survival rates probably from those silly few stores who pay for their staff to get educated on such things or show them what to ask and look for when diagnosing and pobably those silly few stores who have a few comprehensive books on such things under their counter so they can discuss and try to clarify with their customers what the symptoms are like or evn those same silly stores that invite th customer to bring in the fish for a more thorough investigation

    i do agree that most likely 99% of diagnosis is abit of guesswork or should i say process of elimination because it does seem a bit hard to find a vet that will x-ray or catscan my fish nowdays an trying to get them to take blood pls,dont get me started, and since my fish hae taken a lifelong vow of silence it seems askingthem whats thematter dosent have the same effect

    so it is good common sense you say for petshops to stuff their shelves with chemicals they know little about and just hand them out like lollies whenever i come in with a problem

    All they have in shop are a collection of odd chemicals and potions that are sold as miracle cures and there is no guarantee they will even come close to addressing the real problem.

    is that really yr expected result from petshops ??

    better yet they should have a sign "all care no resposiblilty taken " just like my mechanic does and when the preverbale hits the wall lets all hail jennifer who says " lets give these petshops a break" because they need to earn a living too and if you dont buy more fish from them from their mistakes then how are they to survive

    no thanks mrs FNZAS executive with comments like those its no wonder this hobby is sinking faster than Chris Carter at a mardi gra

    not only are you damaging the hobby you have jst painted every shop with the same brush and i know that there are two really good hard working specialised fishshops out here that do not need yr kind of comments

  6. man joined a very exclusive nudist colony. On

    > his first day he took off his

    > clothes and started to wander around the area. A

    > gorgeous petite blonde

    > walked by, and the man immediately got an erection.

    >

    > The woman noticed his erection, came over to him

    > and asked, 'did you call for

    > me?'

    >

    > The man replied, 'No, what do you mean?'

    >

    > She said, 'You must be new here. Let me explain.

    > It's a rule here that if you

    > get an erection, it implies you called for me.'

    > Smiling, she led him to the

    > side of the swimming pool, laid down on a towel,

    > eagerly pulled him to her and

    > happily let him have his way with her.

    >

    > Later, the man continued to explore the colony's

    > facilities. He entered the

    > sauna and as he sat down, he farted. Within

    > seconds a huge, hairy man lumbered

    > out of the steam room toward him.

    >

    > 'Did you call for me? ' asked the hairy man.

    >

    > 'No, what do you mean?' replied the newcomer.

    >

    > 'You must be new.' answered the hairy man, 'It's

    > a rule that if you fart, it

    > implies that 'you called for me.' The huge man

    > easily spun him around, put him

    > over a bench and had his way with the newcomer.

    >

    > The newcomer staggered back to the colony office

    > where he was greeted by a

    > smiling, naked receptionist, 'May I help you?'

    > she asked.

    >

    > 'Here's my membership card. You can have the key

    > back and you can keep the $500

    > membership fee.'

    >

    > 'But, Sir,' she replied, 'you've only been here

    > a few hours. You haven't had a

    > chance to see all our facilities.'

    >

    > 'Listen lady, I'm 68 years old. I only get an

    > erection once a month, but I fart

    > 15 or 20 times a day. I'm outta here

  7. Young King Arthur was ambushed and imprisoned by the monarch of a neighboring kingdom. The monarch could have killed him but was moved by Arthur's youth and ideals. So, the monarch offered him his freedom, as long as he could answer a very difficult question. Arthur would have a year to figure out the answer and, if after a year, he still had no answer, he would be put to death.

    The question? ... What do women really want? Such a question would perplex even the most knowledgeable man, and to young Arthur, it seemed an impossible query ... But, since it was better than death, he accepted the monarch's proposition to have an answer by year's end.

    He returned to his kingdom and began to poll everyone: the princess, the priests, the wise men and even the court jester. He spoke with everyone, but no one could give him a satisfactory answer.

    Many people advised him to consult the old witch, for only she would have the answer.

    But the price would be high, as the witch was famous throughout the kingdom for the exorbitant prices she charged.

    The last day of the year arrived and Arthur had no choice but to talk to the witch. She agreed to answer the question, but he would have to agree to her price first ...

    The old witch wanted to marry Sir Lancelot, the most noble of the Knights of the Round Table and Arthur's closest friend!

    Young Arthur was horrified. She was hunchbacked and hideous, had only one tooth, smelled like sewage, made obscene noises, etc. He had never encountered such a repugnant creature in all his life.

    He refused to force his friend to marry her and endure such a terrible burden; but Lancelot, learning of the proposal, spoke with Arthur.

    He said nothing was too big a sacrifice compared to Arthur's life and the preservation of the Round Table.

    Hence, a wedding was proclaimed and the witch answered Arthur's question thus:

    What a woman really wants, she answered ... is to be in charge of her own life.

    Everyone in the kingdom instantly knew that the witch had uttered a great truth and that Arthur's life would be spared.

    And so it was, the neighboring monarch granted Arthur his freedom and Lancelot and the witch had a wonderful wedding.

    The honeymoon hour approached and Lancelot, steeling himself for a horrific experience, entered the bedroom. But, what a sight awaited him ... The most beautiful woman he had ever seen lay before him on the bed ... The astounded Lancelot asked what had happened.

    The beauty replied that since he had been so kind to her when she appeared as a witch, she would henceforth, be her horrible deformed self only half the time and the beautiful maiden the other half.

    Which would he prefer? Beautiful during the day ... or night?

    Lancelot pondered the predicament. During the day, a beautiful woman to show off to his friends, but at night, in the privacy of his castle, an old witch? Or, would he prefer having a hideous witch during the day, but by night, a beautiful woman for him to enjoy wondrous intimate moments?

    What would YOU do?

    What Lancelot chose is below. BUT ... make YOUR choice before you scroll down below. OKAY?

    Noble Lancelot said that he would allow HER to make the choice herself ...

    Upon hearing this, she announced that she would be beautiful all the time because he had respected her enough to let her be in charge of her own life.

    Now ... what is the moral to this story?

    Scroll down

    The moral is ...

    If you don't let a woman have her own way ...

    Things are going to get ugly

  8. A young boy went up to his father and asked him, 'Dad, what is the difference between 'potentially' and 'realistically'?'

    The father thought for a moment, then answered, 'Go ask your mother if she would sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars.

    Then ask your sister if she would sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars, and then ask your brother if he'd sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars. Come back and tell me what you learn from that.

    So the boy went to his mother and asked, 'Would you sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars?'

    The mother replied, 'Of course I would! We could really use that money to fix up the house and send you kids' to a great University!'

    The boy then went to his sister and asked, 'Would you sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars?'

    The girl replied, 'Oh my Gawd! I LOVE Brad Pitt I would sleep with him in a heartbeat, are you nuts?'

    The boy then went to his brother and asked, 'Would you sleep with Brad Pitt for a million dollars?'

    'Of course,' the brother replied. 'Do you know what a million bucks would buy?'

    The boy pondered the answers for a few days and then went back to his dad.

    His father asked him, 'Did you find out the difference between 'potentially' and 'realistically'?'

    The boy replied, 'Yes, 'Potentially', you and I are sitting on three million dollars.

    But 'realistically', we're living with two hookers and a homo.'

  9. have you got both the golds and the browns?

    yes adodge

    did you cross them with gbas? or did gold ones come in?

    no these are recessive gene albino red eye longfins seems one of the female longfin bristlenose carries the receessive gene and hence when they bred i got 25% golden but only one female has the gene as another female produced all brown longfin

×
×
  • Create New...