Jump to content

Stella

Members
  • Posts

    2975
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Stella

  1. Hello again! Wow, it is such a long time since I have been here! In my defense, a motorhome really isn't a suitable place for keeping aquaria. The water lands on the bed when you drive around a corner....

    Here's the exciting bit: I am currently revising y book,  The New Zealand Native Freshwater Aquarium, for publication as a second edition, due out in October.

    I want to replace some of the photos with better ones, or add others to illustrate different things. I am wondering if anyone has photos of their native aquaria that I could use?

    They need to be of a display-quality tank, with no exotic plants or fish, and with natural decor, well lit and without uncroppable reflections on the glass. The photos themselves need to be large, in focus. Within, that, I am open to anything! :) Even photos of parasites and diseases are useful. Also underwater photos in the wild. As long as they are suitably focussed etc for publication in a book.

    If I use your photo/s, I can offer you fame (all photos will be credited) and a free copy of the book.

    The rest of you will just have to wait until October ;)

    Stella

  2. :lol: terribly sorry about that, Caryl!

    Don't worry, the next one will be much harder to lose. A big thick coffee-table style book, doing real justice to Rod Morris' photos which will be in almost every spread, with the text exploring the native fish fauna as a whole - chapters on habitat, migration, reproduction, diet, biogeography/phylogeny, behaviour, parasites and diseases, and a comparison of the 'themes' of the native fish fauna compared with the world.

    You will be able to order it in about fifty years time when I emerge from my study with the completed epic tome, frail and blinking in the bright light ;) :sage:

  3. 86dcb04c-4b24-11e3-926d-12313b082460-original.jpg

    And a radio interview of me enthusing about native fish: http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/nights/audio/2575760/on-the-spot

    Sorry I haven't been around here much in the last year! Aquaria don't work so well when living in a campervan. I may get a bit more involved in the aquarium side of things soon as Zealandia is wanting to renovate their approach to native fish and is seeking my advice. I will get back into aquaria one day when the idea of living in house without wheels doesn't disturb me so much.

    Meanwhile, I have plans for my third book on native fish... ;)

  4. redfins, as the colourationseems to vary quite a bit between different populations.

    The intensity of coloration is highly variable. It relates to the colour and size of the substrate and the amount of light penetrating the stream. Even within one tank (5000L tank at te manawa, Palmerston North) the redfins that made their home at the sandy end of the tank were distinctively speckly compared to those that lived in the other two thirds of the tank amongst rocks and large gravel!

  5. They will survive if you move them. It is fascinating watching them develop and they little eyes appearing then the larva starting to wriggle.

    Redfin being diadromous means the eggs are astonishingly small. Non diadromous eggs are a far better size for observing.whentheeggshatch the male will shimmy repeatedly over the eggs,which probably helps to release them. A friend raised some eggs away from the male and there was a decent proportion that seemed to get stuck. Also he had a bubbler in there to replace the male's oxygenating role, but I think it was too turbulent after hatching as they wound up with messed up swim bladders and didn't survive after the yolk was absorbed. Mine in a quieter tank spent a few hours vigorously swimming up and down the water column and had decent swim bladders after that.

    Not hard rules, just a couple of observation that may or may not relate to reality..

  6. That is so exciting! What a find! :f77:

    Giants seem a bit touchy about being taken into captivity when big. You are better off getting a small one and growing it up (and then you would feel so proud of it!). I would love to try an estuary tank one day. Not brackish, but estuary themed with sand and reeds and stuff.

  7. Ah ha!i am now in the presence of my book! Oops regarding riffle not being in the index. Riffle tanks discussed on p78, current discussed on p68. My recommendation here was a flow of total tank volume turnover of minimum 20 (or 30) per hour. I now err towards 30 as a minimum.

    So the calculation to find the minimum flow rate is (tank volume) x 30. It is best to then divide this number across several pumps to get an even flow, and position the pumps horizontally at the bottom of the tank.

    Thanks for the clarification on wave makers, I wasn't familiar with how they work (but I do envy yours! Awesome flow)

    Bluegills are definitely hard to keep fed with other species too. In my riffle tank the torries and shortjaws kept scaring them off, and cutting the ox heart small enough for them was difficult (later I discovered mouli graters on frozen heart). I would thaw bloodworms under the tap (to remove excess nutrients in the water around them) in a sieve, then deliver the worms to the bluegills at the bottom of the tank and use the sieve to scare off the other fish so the bluegills could eat uninterrupted. The bluegills learned SO fast and were not scared by the sieve because they knew what I was doing. Soon they would race to the front of the tank as soon as they saw me holding the sieve!

  8. Every morphological feature of a common or giant bully can be found in the other species, apart from the giant's upper size limit and the male common's colored stripe. The other features simply have different averages in each species - on average one has darker or lighter body colour, a more or less tapered head, a higher or lower average of dorsal spines. Some giants have all the standard features of common bullies and vice versa. For visual identification you look at all the features together and the location the fish was found, and decide what it probably is. Genetics are the only precise way, and even then there is still a probability.

    If you look at the distribution map and the inland penetration graph here, you will see how incredibly unlikely it is that the fish in question was a giant bully, no matter how much it may look like one. https://www.niwa.co.nz/freshwater-and-e ... iant_bully

    I am interested to know more about who found it and how they identified it, but if it was a reliable identification it would have generated a lot of interest and there would have been further investigations.

  9. M@t. is onto it. The likely reasons for diadromy include a combination of:

    Food size and density at sea

    Lack of adult parasites and diseases at sea

    The trade off of being able to have smaller and therefore more eggs

    The ability for the species to disperse farther and not have such a precarious existence in such a volatile country with glaciers, volcanos and tectonic action.

    Generalist species can cope better with habitat differences and change

    Conversely the reasons in favourite of losing diadromy include:

    Lower risk to larvae by staying put (including not getting lost, or the physiological strain of biome change)

    The trade off of being able to have larger eggs and therefore more developed and faster growing larvae.

    The ability for a species to specialise and become finely evolved for a specific habitat type

    Being able to utilise habitats that migratory species can't access (eg further inland, beyond barriers)

    It is looking like, for most amphidromous species, there will be a tiny proportion of individuals that do not go to sea, despite having access to it. In some instances this may just be luck of geography or where the larva wound up, but others may not have such an 'urge' to go. If a landslide happens which then isolates some fish from the sea, it is the offspring of these few individuals that are more likely to start a new landlocked population.

    HOWEVER conditions must be right for the larvae to be able to survive, and this is probably the main limiting factor.

    Looking at the diadromous galaxiids, there are many populations of landlocked koaro and banded kokopu, a good number of landlocked giants, about five known of inanga and one known of shortjaws. So this indicates that the rearing requirement for the larva of each species are quite different, and occur more frequently for some species and not others.

    Looking closer at each species there are geographic differences as well. Landlocked banded kokopu populations are far more common in the North Island than the South. Koaro are the opposite (landlocked koaro in the central North Island lakes were mostly translocated by early Maori). Landlocked Giant kokopu are mostly in the lower South Island, and landlocked inanga (including the dwarf inanga and dune lakes galaxias, which were originally landlocked inanga) are only found in Northland. This all indicates differences in larval rearing requirements, which may relate directly to temperature, productivity of the waters, zooplankton community and who knows what else.

    Back to your redfins. They will spawn in captivity. The eggs will hatch. Without a labourious artificial transition to sea water and back, they will all die. The is a very very small chance that a few might survive. The offspring of those fish might have a slightly elevated chance of rearing in fresh water, they might not. There are no known landlocked populations of redfins, although a tiny proportion of fish in certain sampled populations have been shown to never enter sea water, thus the rearing conditions are very picky.

    Sounds likely that the warmer water may have tricked their biological clocks. Probably also the day/night period changed, this is also a huge factor in seasonal fertility in animals (inc farm animals).

×
×
  • Create New...