The New Zealand government decided to ask the royal commission to look into GE, and come up with a recommendation after looking at the possible risks and benefits of the new technology. In the meantime they put an immediate ban on it - the moratorium.
Well, the commission came back, with a solution that was fair and sensible. That GE should proceed but with the necessary laws to make sure that the risks are minimized. Since its not a popular thing to do they were totally ignored. People pushed their own agendas- not based on rational science but very much on a pre-disposition of fear.
I'm in a rather unusual position, in that I'm all for science and I'm all for conservation. I've pretty much given up on trying to convince people of how GE is one of the most beneficial technologies of all time, as in the end everyone will be forced to deal with it, and it will become commonplace. The New Zealand government wants GE, but they don't want to be associated with it. Right now they are spending millions of dollars in GE research, but not saying it publicly.
How weird is it that I want nuclear power, GE and sustainable whaling, whilst also being anti global warming, anti bottom trawling and anti overfishing. The fact that science supports the affirmative of all the positions above, while in the populace it creates huge divisions, shows that the problem's with people, not science. I'm of a strange new generation where science is my religion, but it's not actually, if you catch my drift. :lol:
I think its ironic that Green Peace will flout all the science behind global warming but totally ignore the science behind the safety of GE. The story is the same on both ends of the spectrum.