Jump to content

coelacanth

Members
  • Posts

    744
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by coelacanth

  1. yes, it was a fun thread. I know there are a number of people who enjoyed it (though they probably wouldn't admit it on the forum for fear of being ostracised). Its just a shame that more people didn't have the nerve to get involved, because the ones that did hardly provided much of a challenge for someone as inflammed as I.

    With regards to the book it turns out that local booksellers probably won't order it in for you, so if you want it you'll have to buy it online at the link provided in my initial post. In a bit of a turn-around to what I stated about it being well worth purchasing, at the price it is on there I would have to say that it isn't worth getting. It's small and actually quite basic - if it was available in NZ at an appropriate price then it would be worth getting but not if you're forking out that amount of money. However, if you're of a devious bent and have access to a library copy then you could always scan the whole thing onto your computer.

  2. @ coelacanth: The only thing worse than a troll, is a troll that thinks that they are superior to every one else and sits on thier high horse glancing down on everyone.

    Then, when confronted, tries to diverge and dismiss the real fact that they have offended some people.

    Then, cannot simply apologise, but rather continue with thier megalomaniac and elitist remarks and putting down other members of the forum.

    If this is how you want to make your "Come-back", I think that you will find youself very much ousted and ignored.

    Indeed, whether you chose to let that affect you or not, is on your own head.

    I assume the remark you will make right about now is something along the lines that you don't care since "99% of [us] are morons"

    If you so believe that most of the people here are morons, let me direct you to the "X" at the top right of the screen. I doubt that, if this sort of behaviour is how you wish to continue to conduct yourself, you will be missed.

    Yawn. Nice attempt at sounding smart. Come back when your posts contain less “fail”. However as you imply I have offended 99% of the forum then I shall indeed apologise for having offending you Cricketman

    p.s. are you really such a fan of mine that you believe me to be making a “Come-back”?

  3. You are kidding me coelacanth, right? Where did you get the statistic 99% from? Yes, I know I shouldn't be feeding the troll but seriously, I cannot ignore that. :evil:

    If you are going to participate please try to keep up. This is of course a completely random number of absolutely no mathematical value - the reason being that it is very obviously a direct reference to the original (also imaginary) 99% statistic.

    You have a point there Sam, he may be good at spelling but his maths skills suck.

    As per the above. If you do not understand a concept it's probably better not to draw attention to that fact by trying to be clever about it. You cannot best me with stupidity.

    :D

    Ah, emoticons. Along with acronyms, the refuge of those who lack the ability to indulge in word-play. But, well, it is Dixon after all....

  4. Perhaps they are. One thing I have learned is where I like to spend my time and it's not playing 'I'm smarter than you' games.

    My last words in this thread......Enjoy your time on the forum, I look forward to your future postings.

    I, on the other hand, love to indulge in what livingart calls "mental sparring" (I think "mental fencing" has a nicer sound to it though). It's what separates us from the animals - the stupid ones at least :D

    Sad to see you bow out so soon, I doff my hat to you good sir.

  5. the thread was indeed taken off topic because of your original sig but marklb did mention the book in his original post

    the thread was then kept off topic by your response and subsequent replies

    That may very well be true, however I simply agreed with MarkLB's assessment of himself, suggested he read the book, and also suggested a way in which to improve himself given his own opinion of himself as he stated. You may note that I referred to the book myself in that post so by your own reasoning it was no more off-topic than MarkLB's response.

    (By the way livingart, I do include you in the 1% of the initial signature percentage I gave ;) Other people can come to their own judgement of where they fall)

  6. I do apologise if my spelling mistake confused you coelacanth. I'm sure 99% of the members here got my meaning despite your opinion of them.

    as 99% of the members cannot spell themselves, I'd quite agree that based on their own abilities they would certainly have "got [your] meaning" as you so colloquially phrased it. However I'm not so sure why you believe that your own poor spelling skills left me in a state of confusion, as I quite clearly gave you benefit of doubt in assuming you knew the correct word to use but could not spell it. Perhaps reading as well as spelling lessons are in order for you?

  7. Sorry, we're all out of troll food :)

    definition of the word "troll" from Wikipedia

    In Internet slang, a troll is someone who posts inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room or blog, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

    the topic of the thread (i.e. the new book which has been recently published) is appropriate for the forum. It has been other members who have taken the thread off-topic based on my personal signature which had nothing to do with the thread's subject. You may note that there has not been a single post on the actual topic of the thread....

  8. I'd like to take your advise but apparently there's a high chance I'm a moron so I probably won't.

    Well I'll take your word for your likely inclusion in the percentage. It would however suggest that reading the book would be a step forward for you, whereas deciding NOT to read it on the basis of your claimed lack of mental acuity is just keeping you at said point.

    By the way, here's a hint: I assume you simply spelled "advice" incorrectly, rather than using the word "advise" in an erroneous fashion. Spell-check - or a dictionary if you have one - does go at least some way to hiding that you're within the percentage ;)

  9. http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/detail/821452

    brand new book out, "New Zealand Native Freshwater Fish For Aquariums". Its great to see a book like this finally out -- and most importantly one that has been written by someone (David Cooper) who actually knows what he's talking about, has all the relevant experience, and who is well-regarded by the scientific fish community in NZ. Well worth buying for anyone out there who keeps natives.

  10. Edited by Mod - Billaney, comment not called for.

    DoC has NOTHING to do with breeding or releasing trout or salmon!! Fish And Game are responsible for that. They are completely different organisations! MaF is also a different organisation with different responsibilities. MoF is also a different organisation with different responsibilities. Is this getting through to anyone? You might as well say that DoC are hypocrites because hobbyists like to keep African cichlids.

    I'm constantly amazed at the huge amount of anti-DoC and anti-MaF feelings commonly displayed on this forum. Its really pathetic.

  11. I have to say I've seen one of these guys and it was a bit sad. It spent a lot of time hiding and didn't seem to have much interest in checking out new things in its enclosure, unlike my axies who are very nosy, or just plain greedy :P If I remember rightly they're much more prone to illness and if limbs are damaged they don't regrow as their regenerative abilities are lost once they change although I'm not 100% sure on that. All in all I think they look much better and happier in the water.

    Ambystoma are a group called mole salamanders, and they are called that for a reason. To say that they are better off as aquatic larvae because they seem "sad" when metamorphosed is like saying that butterflies look so pretty fluttering around in the sun and are thus "happier" than they are as caterpillars. Its just the way nature is. Don't put your anthropomorphic attitudes upon it.

    [ps, the above is not about "artificial" metamorphosing, just about the comment quoted]

×
×
  • Create New...